Provider Comparison

Compare leading cryonics providers side-by-side on services, pricing, facilities, experience, member support, and more to help you make an informed, future-focused decision.

hero-inner-image
alcor-gradient-background-2 inner-image-overlay-desktop

Choosing a cryonics provider is an important decision.

This side-by-side comparison highlights key differences in experience, capabilities, and approach, so you can see how each organization operates at a glance. To learn more about Alcor’s unique strengths, visit The Alcor Advantage.

Provider Comparison (2025)

Feature
Cryonics InstituteTomorrowBio
Years in operation
53 years
49 years
5 years
Patients in Care
252
270
20
Organization Type
Nonprofit Organization
Nonprofit Organization
For-Profit Company
US Headquartered
Storage Facility in the United States
Whole-body Cryopreservation
Neuropreservation

Maintains protective cranial structure

Isolated brain extraction
Most Advanced Cryoprotectant Available

M22


Professional Research Department
Age Based Dues for Fairness
Deployment and Recovery Team (D.A.R.T)
US Deployment Composition
In-House Deployment and Recovery Team (D.A.R.T)
Third-party contractors and volunteers
Third-party contractors and volunteers
Extensive US Legal Infrastructure
Political Monitoring and Lobbying
Long-term Patient Care Funds

Dedicated Trust
$34.5M as of 2025

Accepts Members Globally
Organizational Experience & Track Record
Very high
High
Low

Note: This chart is based on our own category definitions and publicly available information (as of 8/25). It is for general informational purposes only and may not reflect all services or definitions used by each provider.

Key Takeaways

Over five decades of proven cryonics leadership.
Expertise in handling the most complex preservation cases.
Strong, secure funding dedicated to patient care.
Broad in-house capabilities across research, engineering, legal, deployment and recovery.